United States v. Mario Medrano-Sanchez

556 F. App'x 333
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 21, 2014
Docket13-40628
StatusUnpublished

This text of 556 F. App'x 333 (United States v. Mario Medrano-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mario Medrano-Sanchez, 556 F. App'x 333 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mario Medrano-Sanchez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno, 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir.2012), cert. de *334 nied, - U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 2044, 185 L.Ed.2d 902 (2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug-trafficking offense. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jesus Rodriguez-Escareno
700 F.3d 751 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Lucia v. SEC
585 U.S. 237 (Supreme Court, 2018)
Rodriguez-Escareno v. United States
569 U.S. 967 (Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 F. App'x 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mario-medrano-sanchez-ca5-2014.