United States v. Mario Antonio MacHado and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Mario Antonio MacHado and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada

8 F.3d 32, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34988

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 5, 1993·No. 92-10604·Unpublished

Opinion

8 F.3d 32w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mario Antonio MACHADO-MARTINEZ and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-10604, 92-10569.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1993.
Decided Oct. 5, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 F.3d 32w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mario Antonio MACHADO-MARTINEZ and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada,
Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 92-10604, 92-10569.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 12, 1993.
Decided Oct. 5, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

United States v. Mario Antonio MacHado and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada, 8 F.3d 32, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 34988 (9th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

8 F.3d 32 (United States v. Mario Antonio MacHado and Rene Roberto Luna-Airada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.