United States v. Marinello

855 F.3d 455, 2017 WL 640078, 119 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 770, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2686
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2017
Docket15-2224
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 855 F.3d 455 (United States v. Marinello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marinello, 855 F.3d 455, 2017 WL 640078, 119 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 770, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2686 (2d Cir. 2017).

Opinions

ORDER

Following disposition of this appeal, an active judge of the Court requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.

Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge, joined by José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marinello v. United States
584 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
855 F.3d 455, 2017 WL 640078, 119 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 770, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marinello-ca2-2017.