United States v. Marie Maturo

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Marie Maturo

191 F.2d 736

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 10, 1951

Docket14420

StatusPublished

This text of 191 F.2d 736 (United States v. Marie Maturo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Marie Maturo, 191 F.2d 736 (8th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

191 F.2d 736

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Marie MATURO.

No. 14420.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

September 10, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Ed Dupree, General Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, Leon J. Libeu, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, and Nathan Siegel, Attorney, Office of Rent Stabilization, all of Washington, D. C. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

191 F.2d 736

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Marie MATURO.

No. 14420.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

September 10, 1951.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Ed Dupree, General Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, Leon J. Libeu, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Office of Rent Stabilization, and Nathan Siegel, Attorney, Office of Rent Stabilization, all of Washington, D. C. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 F.2d 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marie-maturo-ca8-1951.