United States v. Mariano Caballero-Cruz

548 F. App'x 319
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2013
Docket13-50165
StatusUnpublished

This text of 548 F. App'x 319 (United States v. Mariano Caballero-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mariano Caballero-Cruz, 548 F. App'x 319 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mariano Caballero-Cruz raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Villanueva-Diaz, 634 F.3d 844, 852 (5th Cir.2011), in which we held that speculation that an alien would not have been removed is not sufficient to establish the prejudice required for a collateral attack on removal proceedings. Caballero-Cruz also preserves for possible Supreme Court review a foreclosed challenge to United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir.2002), in which we held that deportation errors involving discretionary relief do not violate due process.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Villanueva-Diaz
634 F.3d 844 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Joel Lopez-Ortiz
313 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mariano-caballero-cruz-ca5-2013.