United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero. Read the opinion of the Court — 723 F.3d 1085
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2013·No. 12-10220·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10220 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:11-cr-02432-CKJ- GEE-1 MARGARITO FLORES- CORDERO, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

Filed October 4, 2013

Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and Sarah S. Vance, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

The Opinion filed July 25, 2013, appearing at 723 F.3d 1085, is amended as follows:

1. At slip op. 4, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1086, line 2 of the third full paragraph, insert “or risk” between the words “application” and “of.”

* The Honorable Sarah S. Vance, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

2. At slip op. 8, in the first sentence of the second full paragraph; 723 F.3d at 1088, line 4 of the second full paragraph, delete the word “serious.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero, (9th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero (United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Margarito Flores-Cordero
723 F.3d 1085 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)