United States v. Margarita Martinez De Ortiz

897 F.2d 220, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377, 1990 WL 20175
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 14, 1990·No. 88-1760·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The suggestion for rehearing en banc in this case is granted. The judgment entered by the panel is vacated, and the case *221 will be set for oral argument at the convenience of the court.

The parties are invited to file supplementary briefs addressing the question whether § 5.11 of this circuit’s pattern jury instructions, Federal Criminal Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit § 5.11 (1980), is consistent with Fed.R.Evid. 104 and Bourjaily v. United States, 483 U.S. 171, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987). The federal defenders of this circuit also are invited to file briefs addressing this question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Margarita Martinez De Ortiz, 897 F.2d 220, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3377, 1990 WL 20175 (7th Cir. 1990).

897 F.2d 220 (United States v. Margarita Martinez De Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kyle Grasso
724 F.3d 1077 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Cirilo-Munoz
582 F.3d 54 (First Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Huezo
546 F.3d 174 (Second Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Gabriel Parra Lopez
443 F.3d 1026 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Mangual-Corchado
139 F.3d 34 (First Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Margarita Martinez De Ortiz
907 F.2d 629 (Seventh Circuit, 1990)