United States v. Marfo

571 F. App'x 250
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 16, 2014·No. No. 13-4913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frank Marfo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking the identities and notes of the grand juries that returned the indictment and superseding indictment in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marfo, No. 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3 (D.Md. Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marfo, 571 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2014).

571 F. App'x 250 (United States v. Marfo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related