United States v. Marcus Walker

936 F.3d 183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Marcus Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 990 F.3d 316
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided September 6, 2019·No. 15-4062·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 15-4062

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

MARCUS WALKER, Appellant

On Appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. 2-13-cr-00391-002) Honorable Legrome D. Davis, U.S. District Judge

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

Present: JORDAN, KRAUSE, and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been

submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The opinion and

judgment entered on June 5, 2019, are vacated.1

The parties are directed to file supplemental letter briefs, limited to five single-

spaced pages, addressing the significance of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319

1 As the merits panel has vacated the prior opinion and judgment, action is not required by the en banc court. (2019), for the proper disposition of this case. The supplemental letter briefs should be

directed to the panel and must be filed within fourteen days.

BY THE COURT,

s/ Cheryl Ann Krause Circuit Judge

Dated: September 6, 2019 ARR/cc: All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marcus Walker, 936 F.3d 183 (3d Cir. 2019).

936 F.3d 183 (United States v. Marcus Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Davis
588 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 2019)