United States v. Marcus Terrell Burney
This text of 702 F. App'x 192 (United States v. Marcus Terrell Burney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Marcus Terrell Burney appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 7:12-cr-00068-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
702 F. App'x 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marcus-terrell-burney-ca4-2017.