United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2018
Docket17-40368
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria (United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-40368 Document: 00514416898 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-40368 FILED Summary Calendar April 5, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCO ANTONIO GARCIA-ECHAVERRIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1046-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Marco Antonio Garcia-Echaverria appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment, which was premised on a collateral attack on a prior removal order. He contends that the immigration judge (IJ) who presided over his prior removal proceeding violated his due process rights by failing to advise him of his eligibility for discretionary relief under § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182. Garcia-Echaverria’s

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-40368 Document: 00514416898 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2018

No. 17-40368

argument is foreclosed by this court’s precedent. See United States v. Lopez- Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir. 2002) (“[E]ligibility for § 212(c) relief is not a liberty or property interest warranting due process protection.”). Consequently, Garcia-Echaverria has not shown that that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. See id. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Joel Lopez-Ortiz
313 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Marco Garcia-Echaverria, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marco-garcia-echaverria-ca5-2018.