United States v. Marco Ayala-Garcia

619 F. App'x 434
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2015
Docket14-41428
StatusUnpublished

This text of 619 F. App'x 434 (United States v. Marco Ayala-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Marco Ayala-Garcia, 619 F. App'x 434 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Marco Antonio Ayala-Garcia raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, we rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly, the unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Francisco Morales-Mota
704 F.3d 410 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 F. App'x 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marco-ayala-garcia-ca5-2015.