United States v. March
This text of 615 F. App'x 827 (United States v. March) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Gonzales March appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. March, Nos. 3:08-cr-00590-CMC-6; 3:12-cv-01977-CMC; 3:10-cv-70294-CMC (D.S.C. May 7, 2015). We deny March’s motion to supplement a request for a certificate of appealability as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 F. App'x 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-march-ca4-2015.