United States v. Marbley

286 F. App'x 930
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 15, 2008·No. No. 07-3464·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This appeal raises one issue: Does a district court at sentencing have authority not to follow the sentencing guidelines’ disparate treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses? The district court in this case held that it had no such authority. Subsequent to that determination, the Supreme Court held that a sentencing “judge may consider the disparity between the Guidelines’ treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses.” Kimbrough v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 564, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). In view of Kimbrough, the government concedes that we should remand this case for resen-tencing. We agree and therefore vacate the sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing in light of Kimbrough.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Marbley, 286 F. App'x 930 (6th Cir. 2008).

286 F. App'x 930 (United States v. Marbley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malcom v. Arnold
E.D. Michigan, 2022
Kingsbury v. Westlake Management Co.
674 F. App'x 792 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Evanston Insurance v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.
602 F. Supp. 3d 610 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)