United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
This text of 102 S. Ct. 1703 (United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Facts and opinion, In the Matter of Northern Pipeline Construction Company, Bkrtcy., 6 B.R. 928; D.C., 12 B.R. 946.
The motion of Beneficial Corporation for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied. The motion of Commercial Law League of America to reconsider order denying motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for argument is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S. Ct. 1703, 72 L. Ed. 2d 130, 455 U.S. 1013, 50 U.S.L.W. 3764, 1982 U.S. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marathon-pipe-line-co-scotus-1982.