United States v. Maple Lee Croffe

876 F.2d 895, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8826, 1989 WL 64404
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1989·No. 88-2009·Unpublished

Opinion

876 F.2d 895

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Maple Lee CROFFE, Defendant-Appellant

No. 88-2009.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 16, 1989.

Before KENNEDY, RALPH B. GUY and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maple Lee Croffe, 876 F.2d 895, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8826, 1989 WL 64404 (6th Cir. 1989).

876 F.2d 895 (United States v. Maple Lee Croffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related