United States v. Maple Lee Croffe
This text of 876 F.2d 895 (United States v. Maple Lee Croffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Maple Lee CROFFE, Defendant-Appellant
No. 88-2009.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 16, 1989.
Before KENNEDY, RALPH B. GUY and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
876 F.2d 895, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8826, 1989 WL 64404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maple-lee-croffe-ca6-1989.