United States v. Manuel Rodriguez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Manuel Rodriguez

574 F. App'x 875

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Manuel Rodriguez. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 F.3d 1299 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 31, 2014·No. 14-10117·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Cone, appointed counsel for Manuel Rodriguez in this appeal from his resentencing following our opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 732 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir.2013), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Cone, appointed counsel for Manuel Rodriguez in this appeal from his resentencing following our opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 732 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir.2013), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Manuel Rodriguez, 574 F. App'x 875 (11th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

574 F. App'x 875 (United States v. Manuel Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related