United States v. Manuel Rios-Ojeda

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2017·No. 16-40944·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 16-40944 Document: 00513882987 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40944 Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL RIOS-OJEDA, also known as Jose Ortiz-Villarreal, also known as Victor Flores-Huerta, also known as Ulises Garrido-Zambudio,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CR-74-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Manuel Rios-Ojeda raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2014). In Rodriguez-Salazar, 768 F.3d at 437-38, we rejected the argument that the Texas offense of theft is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of theft because the Texas offense, which includes

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 16-40944 Document: 00513882987 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017

No. 16-40944

theft by deception, may be committed by taking property with the owner’s consent. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Manuel Rios-Ojeda, (5th Cir. 2017).

United States v. Manuel Rios-Ojeda (United States v. Manuel Rios-Ojeda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Eduardo Rodriguez-Salazar
768 F.3d 437 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)