United States v. Manuel Garcia Iriarte

438 F.2d 1233

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 12, 1971·No. 25878·Published

Opinion

438 F.2d 1233

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Manuel Garcia IRIARTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 25878.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; A. Andrew Hauk, Judge.

Ralph R. Lopez, of Lopez & Reinhart, Salinas, Cal., for appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, James W. Brannigan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction if affirmed.

The ground for appeal is that: Trial counsel was incompetent. We simply do not find this to be so.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

438 F.2d 1233

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Manuel Garcia IRIARTE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 25878.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; A. Andrew Hauk, Judge.

Ralph R. Lopez, of Lopez & Reinhart, Salinas, Cal., for appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, James W. Brannigan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction if affirmed.

The ground for appeal is that: Trial counsel was incompetent. We simply do not find this to be so.

United States v. Manuel Garcia Iriarte, 438 F.2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

438 F.2d 1233 (United States v. Manuel Garcia Iriarte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.