United States v. Manuel Garcia Iriarte
This text of 438 F.2d 1233 (United States v. Manuel Garcia Iriarte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
438 F.2d 1233
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Manuel Garcia IRIARTE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 25878.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 22, 1971.
Rehearing Denied April 12, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; A. Andrew Hauk, Judge.
Ralph R. Lopez, of Lopez & Reinhart, Salinas, Cal., for appellant.
Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, James W. Brannigan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction if affirmed.
The ground for appeal is that: Trial counsel was incompetent. We simply do not find this to be so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.2d 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-manuel-garcia-iriarte-ca9-1971.