United States v. Manuel Barcelo-Ortega
This text of 545 F. App'x 707 (United States v. Manuel Barcelo-Ortega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Manuel Octavio Barcelo-Ortega appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute 9.7 kilograms of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and possession with intent to distribute 1.1 kilograms of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(i). We have jurisdietion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Barcelo-Ortega contends that the district court erred when it imposed a two-level adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B 1.2(b) for being a minor participant instead of a four-level adjustment for being a minimal participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(a). We review for clear error. United States v. Tankersley, 537 F.3d 1100, 1110 (9th Cir.2008). The district court did not clearly err because Barcelo-Ortega was entrusted with very large quantities of heroin and methamphetamine. See United States v. Rodriguez-Castro, 641 F.3d 1189, 1193 (9th Cir.2011); United States v. Webster, 996 F.2d 209, 211-12 n. 5 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Lui, 941 F.2d 844, 849 (9th Cir.1991).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 F. App'x 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-manuel-barcelo-ortega-ca9-2013.