United States v. Mann

26 F. Cas. 1153, 1 Gall. 3
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 F. Cas. 1153 (United States v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mann, 26 F. Cas. 1153, 1 Gall. 3 (circtdnh 1812).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

As the act has declared the transaction to be a high misdemeanor, punishable by fine and forfeiture of quadruple the value of the merchandizes attempted to be exported, it is dearly a crime against the United States, and not a suit for a penalty. It is therefore within the jurisdiction of this court. The fine is to be’ assessed by the court: not found as a penalty by a jury. In U. S. v. Tyler, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 285, in a prosecution on this same clause, the court held that the fine and quadruple value must be assessed and adjudged by the court, and not by the jury. We indine to think that the cause is rightfully prosecuted by information; and even if we doubted, we should reserve the question until after verdict for the United States, to be argued on a motion in arrest of judgment. Continued for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Union Co. v. United States
132 S. Ct. 2344 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Ex Parte Wilson
114 U.S. 417 (Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 1153, 1 Gall. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mann-circtdnh-1812.