United States v. Mann
This text of 426 F. App'x 541 (United States v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Christopher Lee Mann appeals from the consecutive 44-month and 24-month sentences imposed following the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand for resentencing.
[542]*542Mann contends that the district court procedurally erred by relying on factors excluded from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). It is unclear from the record whether those factors served as the primary basis for the sentences imposed. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.2006); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we vacate and remand for resentencing.
In light of this disposition, we decline to reach Mann’s other arguments.
VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
426 F. App'x 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mann-ca9-2011.