United States v. Maniscalco
This text of 527 F.2d 1344 (United States v. Maniscalco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case and United States v. Ladd, 5th Cir. 1976, 527 F.2d 1341 [74-3757], and United States v. Alfonso et al., 5th Cir. 1976, 527 F.2d 1343 [74-3776], decided this day, are companion cases. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana suppressed wiretap evidence on the ground that the wiretap order of January 7, 1971, was insufficient on its face. The government appeals this ruling.
What was' said in the Ladd case applies here. The court erred m suppressing the evidence. The judgment of the district court is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 F.2d 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maniscalco-ca5-1976.