United States v. Mamadou Sangare
This text of 59 F.3d 168 (United States v. Mamadou Sangare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mamadou SANGARE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6217.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 23, 1995.
Mamadou Sangare, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Gerald McBride, Office of The United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sangare, Nos. CR-93-205-A; CA-94-845-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23192, 1995 WL 373225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mamadou-sangare-ca4-1995.