United States v. Malveaux

411 F.3d 558, 104 F. App'x 430, 2005 WL 1320362
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2004·No. 03-41618·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Malveaux appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Malveaux argues that the district court erred in applying the enhancement provision found in U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) of the Sentencing Guidelines, because there was no evidence that Malveaux possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law of this circuit, we hold that the district court did not err, as a matter of law, in concluding that the firearm possession was “in connection with” the drug possession. See United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 512 (5th Cir.1997); United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d 1190, 1193, 1199-1200 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, the district court correctly applied U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5), and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Malveaux, 411 F.3d 558, 104 F. App'x 430, 2005 WL 1320362 (5th Cir. 2004).

411 F.3d 558 (United States v. Malveaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Malveaux
411 F.3d 558 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
Malveaux v. United States
543 U.S. 1113 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Meza v. United States
543 U.S. 1098 (Supreme Court, 2005)