United States v. Malik Al-Shabazz

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2024
Docket24-6068
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Malik Al-Shabazz (United States v. Malik Al-Shabazz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Malik Al-Shabazz, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6068 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6068

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MALIK AL-SHABAZZ, a/k/a Beaver, a/k/a Beaver G,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cr-00986-TLW-13)

Submitted: June 13, 2024 Decided: June 18, 2024

Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malik Al-Shabazz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6068 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/18/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Malik Al-Shabazz appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(c)(1)(A) motion for a sentence reduction and denying his motions for appointment

of counsel. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. See United States

v. Davis, 99 F.4th 647, 653, 659-60 (4th Cir. 2024) (compassionate release); United States

v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 729-30 (4th Cir. 2000) (appointment of counsel). We therefore

affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Al-Shabazz, No. 3:19-cr-00986-JFA-13

(D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2023; July 12, 2023; July 24, 2023; Aug. 24, 2023; Sept. 6, 2023; Nov. 8,

2023). We deny Al-Shabazz’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bryant Legree
205 F.3d 724 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Antonio Davis
99 F.4th 647 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Malik Al-Shabazz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-malik-al-shabazz-ca4-2024.