United States v. Malhame

10 Cust. Ct. 534, 1943 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1319
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 4, 1943
DocketNo. 5808; Entry No. 720228
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 534 (United States v. Malhame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Malhame, 10 Cust. Ct. 534, 1943 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1319 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal inyolves the question of. the proper dutiable value of certain rosaries imported from China,, and entered. [535]*535at New York on October 17, 1941. The merchandise was appraised as entered, and thereafter the collector filed this appeal.

At the trial of the case a sample of the rosaries, and a certain affidavit executed by a former examiner of merchandise at Chicago, were admitted in evidence. A rosary, which appears to have been forwarded from the port of Chicago, was- marked for identification. The plaintiff also offered the testimony of one witness.

At the close of plaintiff’s case counsel for the defendant made the-following motion:

If your Honor, please, I move that the appeal be dismissed. There is a lack of' evidence of foreign or export value. Even if he was attempting to prove export value he has not proved there was no foreign value. I cannot see a scintilla of evidence in this record that would justify even continuing on with the case. I move that it be dismissed.

I have carefully examined and considered this record and I find that the evidence offered by the plaintiff is wholly insufficient to overcome-the presumption of correctness attaching to the finding of value made by the appraiser. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Judgment will be rendered according^.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 534, 1943 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-malhame-cusc-1943.