United States v. Maldonado-Reyes

367 F. App'x 489
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2009·No. 08-40908·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Gilberto Maldonado-Reyes pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a quantity in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges his sentence and his counsel’s effectiveness with regard to his sentence. The government argues that he waived his right to appeal.

We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo. United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir.2005). Our review of the record shows that Maldonado-Reyes’s waiver of appeal was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir.2005), and is therefore valid, so we decline to consider the merits of his claims. The appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent excépt under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maldonado-Reyes, 367 F. App'x 489 (5th Cir. 2009).

367 F. App'x 489 (United States v. Maldonado-Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bond
414 F.3d 542 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Creadell Burns
433 F.3d 442 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)