United States v. Maldonado-Reyes
This text of 367 F. App'x 489 (United States v. Maldonado-Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gilberto Maldonado-Reyes pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a quantity in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges his sentence and his counsel’s effectiveness with regard to his sentence. The government argues that he waived his right to appeal.
We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo. United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir.2005). Our review of the record shows that Maldonado-Reyes’s waiver of appeal was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir.2005), and is therefore valid, so we decline to consider the merits of his claims. The appeal is DISMISSED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent excépt under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 F. App'x 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maldonado-reyes-ca5-2009.