United States v. Maldonado-Reyes

367 F. App'x 489
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 23, 2009
Docket08-40908
StatusUnpublished

This text of 367 F. App'x 489 (United States v. Maldonado-Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Maldonado-Reyes, 367 F. App'x 489 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Gilberto Maldonado-Reyes pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a quantity in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges his sentence and his counsel’s effectiveness with regard to his sentence. The government argues that he waived his right to appeal.

We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo. United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir.2005). Our review of the record shows that Maldonado-Reyes’s waiver of appeal was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir.2005), and is therefore valid, so we decline to consider the merits of his claims. The appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent excépt under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bond
414 F.3d 542 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Creadell Burns
433 F.3d 442 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
367 F. App'x 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maldonado-reyes-ca5-2009.