United States v. Maldonado

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Maldonado. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 F.3d 637
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 3, 1996·No. 95-11226·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11226 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABEL MALDONADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CR-116-R - - - - - - - - - - November 26, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abel Maldonado appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for trafficking in stolen motor vehicles and motor

vehicle parts with altered vehicle identification numbers, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2321. He argues that the district court

erred in calculating his criminal history score and in

calculating the amount of loss attributable to the scheme.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-11226 - 2 -

The district court did not err in awarding a two-level

increase in Maldonado’s criminal history score for being under a

criminal justice sentence at the time he committed the instant

offense. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(l). The district court did not

err in determining that the amount of loss exceeded $70,000. See

United States v. Wimbish, 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992),

cert. denied, 508 U.S. 919 (1993); U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment.

(n.8).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Maldonado, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Maldonado (United States v. Maldonado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bobby Glen Wimbish
980 F.2d 312 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)