United States v. Makushamari Gozo

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2013·No. 19-4741·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4604

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MAKUSHAMARI GOZO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00393-CCB-1)

Submitted: December 16, 2013 Decided: December 20, 2013

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Makushamari Gozo, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Marshall Nothstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Makushamari Gozo seeks to appeal the district court’s

denial of various motions made in the context of his criminal

proceedings, including motions to suppress and for dismissal of

the indictments. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The orders Gozo seeks to appeal are neither final

orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Makushamari Gozo, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Makushamari Gozo (United States v. Makushamari Gozo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)