United States v. Maiellano

Third Circuit

United States v. Maiellano

125 F.2d 158, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4339

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 1942

DocketNo. 7686

StatusPublished

This text of 125 F.2d 158 (United States v. Maiellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Maiellano, 125 F.2d 158, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4339 (3d Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Every disputed issue in the case at bar is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Continental Casualty Co. and Marie M. Short v. United States of America, 62 S.Ct. 393, 86 L.Ed. -, and must be resolved against the appellees. Accordingly the decree of the court below, remitting the forfeiture of bail and vacating the judgment, is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition for remission of forfeiture.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Every disputed issue in the case at bar is ruled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Continental Casualty Co. and Marie M. Short v. United States of America, 62 S.Ct. 393, 86 L.Ed. -, and must be resolved against the appellees. Accordingly the decree of the court below, remitting the forfeiture of bail and vacating the judgment, is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition for remission of forfeiture.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F.2d 158, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-maiellano-ca3-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack