United States v. Magdaleno

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8191

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

IVAN MAGDALENO,

Defendant – Appellant.

No. 10-6254

Plaintiff - Appellee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:06-cr-00703-GRA-2)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 5, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ivan Magdaleno, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Ivan Magdaleno appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for specific performance of his plea

agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b),

his motion for reconsideration of that denial, and his motion to

reopen the case. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Magdaleno, No. 7:06-cr-

00703-GRA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2009; Nov. 25, 2009; Jan. 26, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED