United States v. Magana
This text of 308 F. App'x 154 (United States v. Magana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jose Leonel Magana appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Magana contends that the district court failed to consider certain evidence of his drug abuse problems in its analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Reviewing for plain error, see United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761 (9th Cir.2008), we conclude that the district court did not procedurally err, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-magana-ca9-2009.