United States v. Madelyn Torres
This text of 77 F.3d 91 (United States v. Madelyn Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
77 F.3d 91
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Madelyn TORRES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-5246.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Jan. 30, 1996.
Decided March 4, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro; Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-30-G).
ARGUED: John Randolph Riley, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert H. Edmunds, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
Prior report: 65 F.3d 1241 (1995).
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed by an evenly-divided vote of the en banc court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 F.3d 91, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-madelyn-torres-ca4-1996.