United States v. Madden
This text of 18 C.M.A. 374 (United States v. Madden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
We granted review in this case to consider whether the accused was prejudiced by trial counsel’s argument relative to the conviction of Private Lawrence.
Lawrence, a coaccused, who testified for the Government, had been previously tried and convicted. Trial counsel frequently referred to Lawrence’s conviction in his argument to the court on the issue of accused’s guilt. The fact of Lawrence’s guilt, however, had initially been made known to the court through cross-examination by defense counsel.
The issue was before us in United States v Domenech, 18 USCMA 314, 40 CMR 26. The reasoning developed in that case is applicable here.
The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 C.M.A. 374, 18 USCMA 374, 40 C.M.R. 86, 1969 CMA LEXIS 797, 1969 WL 6013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-madden-cma-1969.