United States v. Madden

18 C.M.A. 374, 18 USCMA 374, 40 C.M.R. 86, 1969 CMA LEXIS 797, 1969 WL 6013
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided May 29, 1969·No. No. 21,953·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CuRiam:

We granted review in this case to consider whether the accused was prejudiced by trial counsel’s argument relative to the conviction of Private Lawrence.

Lawrence, a coaccused, who testified for the Government, had been previously tried and convicted. Trial counsel frequently referred to Lawrence’s conviction in his argument to the court on the issue of accused’s guilt. The fact of Lawrence’s guilt, however, had initially been made known to the court through cross-examination by defense counsel.

The issue was before us in United States v Domenech, 18 USCMA 314, 40 CMR 26. The reasoning developed in that case is applicable here.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Madden, 18 C.M.A. 374, 18 USCMA 374, 40 C.M.R. 86, 1969 CMA LEXIS 797, 1969 WL 6013 (cma 1969).

18 C.M.A. 374 (United States v. Madden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Domenech
18 C.M.A. 314 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)