United States v. MacWilliams
This text of United States v. MacWilliams (United States v. MacWilliams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6025
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, a/k/a Greg, a/k/a Corporal George,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-6027
THOMAS J. MACWILLIAMS, Greg, Corporal George,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00059-IMK-JSK-1; 1:06-cr-00059-01-IMK-JSK)
Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 28, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas J. MacWilliams, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Thomas J. MacWilliams appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel the release of evidence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. MacWilliams, Nos. 1:06-cr-00059-IMK-JSK-1; 1:06-cr-00059-01-IMK-
JSK (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 15, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. MacWilliams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-macwilliams-ca4-2008.