United States v. Mackey
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51414 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CURTIS DWAYNE MACKEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-332-1 --------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Curtis Dwayne Mackey has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mackey has filed
a response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and
Mackey’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-51414 -2-
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Mackey’s motion for
appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mackey (United States v. Mackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.