United States v. Mackey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6525
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD WINSLOW MACKEY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-226-V, CA-95-85-1-V)
Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Winslow Mackey, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mackey, Nos. CR-90-226-V; CA-95-85-1-V (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mackey (United States v. Mackey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.