United States v. Mackensworth

8 C.M.A. 298, 8 USCMA 298, 24 C.M.R. 108, 1957 CMA LEXIS 387, 1957 WL 4713
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedOctober 4, 1957
DocketNo. 10,361
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 C.M.A. 298 (United States v. Mackensworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mackensworth, 8 C.M.A. 298, 8 USCMA 298, 24 C.M.R. 108, 1957 CMA LEXIS 387, 1957 WL 4713 (cma 1957).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FERGUSON, Judge:

The issue upon which review was granted in this case has already been decided adversely to the Government. United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382; United States v Burgess, 8 USCMA 163, 23 CMR 387. The instruction condemned in those cases is present in the instant case. Accordingly, the findings of guilt of the offense of desertion must be set aside. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs. Judge LatimeR dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sessions
10 C.M.A. 383 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 298, 8 USCMA 298, 24 C.M.R. 108, 1957 CMA LEXIS 387, 1957 WL 4713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mackensworth-cma-1957.