United States v. Mack
This text of United States v. Mack (United States v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7188
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SHARON MACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-147, CA-95-1909-6-20)
Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sharon Mack, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her
28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Appellant's mo-
tions for counsel and preparation of a transcript, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mack, No. CR-92-147; CA-95-1909-6-20 (D.S.C. July 20, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mack-ca4-1996.