United States v. Macias
This text of 21 F. App'x 659 (United States v. Macias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Paulina Bernal Macias appeals her 60-month sentence after being found guilty of: conspiracy to transport and harbor illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I); aiding and abetting the transport of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(II); transporting illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii); and two counts of harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and reverse and remand.
Counsel for Macias has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues on appeal. The government, however, concedes Macias’ 60-month sentence was greater than the maximum allowed for the applicable sentencing guideline range. Macias also has filed a supplemental pro se brief concurring with the government as to the sentencing issue, and our independent review of the record before us compels us to agree.
Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for re-sentencing. We express no opinion as to the validity of Macias’ underlying conviction.1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-macias-ca9-2001.