United States v. Machuca

348 F. App'x 907
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2009
Docket08-50818
StatusUnpublished

This text of 348 F. App'x 907 (United States v. Machuca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Machuca, 348 F. App'x 907 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Carlos Rene Machuca appeals the sentence imposed following his jury convictions for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, aiding and abetting bank fraud, money laundering, and aiding and abetting identity theft. Machuca argues that a U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 enhancement for perjury unconstitutionally infringes on a defendant’s right to testify on his own behalf in a criminal proceeding because the Government may prove the enhancement by only a preponderance of the evidence. This argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 96-97, 113 S.Ct. 1111, 122 L.Ed.2d 445 (1993); United States v. Gourley, 168 F.3d 165, 171 n. 10 (5th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dunnigan
507 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1993)
United States v. Randall Elwood Gourley
168 F.3d 165 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 F. App'x 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-machuca-ca5-2009.