United States v. Macari
This text of 114 F. App'x 338 (United States v. Macari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Peter Macari appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for money laundering conspiracy and an order of forfeiture in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Macari has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Because we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-macari-ca9-2004.