United States v. Mabini

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Mabini

10 F. App'x 573

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 30, 2001

DocketNo. 00-10442; D.C. No. CR-99-20137-RMW

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 573 (United States v. Mabini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Mabini, 10 F. App'x 573 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM²

Noel Castillo Mabini appeals his guilty plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition by [574]*574a prohibited person. Mabini contends that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is invalid because Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to deem such possession criminal. This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Davis, 242 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM²

Noel Castillo Mabini appeals his guilty plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession of a firearm and ammunition by [574]*574a prohibited person. Mabini contends that the felon-in-possession statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is invalid because Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause to deem such possession criminal. This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Davis, 242 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mabini-ca9-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack