United States v. M. H. Pulaski Co.
This text of 238 U.S. 637 (United States v. M. H. Pulaski Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
238 U.S. 637
35 S.Ct. 940
59 L.Ed. 1500
UNITED STATES, Petitioner,
v.
M. H. PULASKI CO. et al.
No. 1033.
UNITED STATES, Petitioner,
v.
R. B. HENRY CO. et al.
No. 1034.
JAMES ELLIOTT & CO. et al.
No. 1035.
J. WILE SONS & CO.
No. 1036.
ROBERT MULLER & CO.
No. 1037.
WOOD & SELICK et al.
No. 1038.
E. LA MONTAGNE'S SONS
No. 1039.
ALBERT LORSCH & CO.
No. 1040.
CULLMAN BROS. et al.
No. 1041.
G. W. FABER INC.
No. 1042.
LOUIS MEYERS & SON
No. 1043.
WILLIAM OPENHYM & SONS
No. 1044.
PARK & TILFORD
No. 1045.
SELGAS & CO.
No. 1046.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 21, 1915
Mr. Solicitor General Davis for petitioner.
Messrs. B. A. Levett, Allan R. Brown, and Albert H. Washburn for respondents.
Granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 U.S. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-m-h-pulaski-co-scotus-1915.