United States v. Lyons
This text of 8 C.M.A. 259 (United States v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
The accused was convicted of desertion for an absence of some four and one-half months’ duration, terminated by apprehension, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. He had pleaded not guilty to desertion, but guilty to the lesser offense of absence without leave, in contravention of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. The issue raised here is the same as [260]*260that previously decided in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Burgess, 8 USCMA 163, 23 CMR 387. For the reasons stated in those opinions, the accused’s conviction cannot stand. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 C.M.A. 259, 8 USCMA 259, 24 C.M.R. 69, 1957 CMA LEXIS 398, 1957 WL 4702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lyons-cma-1957.