United States v. Lyons
This text of 328 F. App'x 415 (United States v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[416]*416MEMORANDUM
Brandon Allen Lyons appeals from the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Lyons contends that the district court erred when it determined that his three prior convictions for first-degree burglary, in violation of Oregon Revised Statute § 164.225, were predicate violent felonies for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Mayer, 560 F.3d 948, 962-63 (9th Cir.2009).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-lyons-ca9-2009.