United States v. Lyons

301 F. App'x 210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lyons. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 F. App'x 120
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. No. 08-7600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Casual Bianca Lyons seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing several claims raised in her motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Lyons seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Lyons’ motions for preparation of a transcript at government expense and to seal all filings in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lyons, 301 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2008).

301 F. App'x 210 (United States v. Lyons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)