United States v. Lynch

144 F. App'x 443
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 378 F.3d 445
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2005·No. 04-30711·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed for Jerry Wayne Lynch has filed a motion for leave to withdraw, a brief, and a supplemental brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lynch has filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s briefs, Lynch’s response, and the record discloses no non-frivolous issue.

We decline to address Lynch’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. See United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 859 (5th Cir.1998).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lynch, 144 F. App'x 443 (5th Cir. 2005).

144 F. App'x 443 (United States v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Carlos Ray Brewster, Jr.
137 F.3d 853 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)