United States v. Lyles
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FILED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 2 o ' ’ U. . Disttlct& pla‘”“ff’ § oii'u'k°vmmouoa:¢w v. ) ) criminal NO. 04-00333-1 (PLF/AK) TORI P. LYLES, ) Defendant. ) )
RE 0 NDATION TO REVOKE AND REIMPOS E 1 E The parties agree that the Defendant’s tenn of supervised release should be revoked, and supervised release reimposed, and there being no objection thereto, IT IS RECOMMENDED TI-IAT: ~ The Defendant be revoked from supervised release and sentenced to a one (1) day incarceration and given credit for one (1) day incarceration that she served on November 16, 2010; ~ That her supervised release be reimposed for a period of six months to expire on April 8, 201 1 ;
~ That the Defe'ndant comply with all previous conditions of supervised release and all
special conditions of supervised release not completed. %z(O/~ //g:l
ALAN Y DATED: December 16, 2010 UNITED STATES MA JUDGE
Failure to tile timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this
report may waive your right of appeal fi'om an order of the District Court adopting such findings
and recommendations. See T?zomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (l985).
The Magistrate Judge having recommended that the term of Defendant’s supervised release be revoked, and supervised release reimposed, and there being no objection thereto, IT IS
ORDERED that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted.
DATED: \);-.f»~‘»- ""’ ,2010 p*~/
uNITED STATES Disriilc'r couRT ruDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lyles (United States v. Lyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.